2014年10月29日 星期三

MH370 Aviation Mystery
In the aviation mystery which has baffled the world there is one fundamental question which continues to swirl: Has Inmarsat got its numbers right?
It was these very calculations which led the search for MH370 far from the plane's original route across South East Asia and deep into the southern Indian Ocean, off the west coast of Australia. No piece of work is more important in the search for the plane.
I was given exclusive access to the satellite experts who did the groundbreaking work. Time and again, I would ask them the toughest question: "Are you right?"
But before we get there ... How did the data come to light in the first place?
Once the plane went missing, the ground station in Perth checked the logs and discovered that while the aircraft's communications systems were switched off, the plane and the satellite still kept saying "hello" to each other, every hour.
"Having messages for six hours after the plane is lost is probably the biggest disbelief," admits Inmarsat's vice president of satellite operations Mark Dickinson.

These messages are the raw data upon which everything rests.
  http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/27/world/asia/mh370-is-inmarsat-right-quest-analysis/index.html

Structure of the Lead :
Who-Inmarsat
When-Not given
What-aviation mystery
Why-Not given
Where-southern Indian Ocean
How-Not given

Keywords :
Aviation (n.)航空
Baffle (v.)困惑
Fundamental (Adj.)基本
Swirl (v.)捲
Inmarsat (n.) 國際海事衛星組織
Satellite (n.) 衛星
Groundbreaking (Adj.)創新
Aircraft (n.)飛機








2014年10月22日 星期三

week1-Sunflower Student Movement

Sunflower Student Movement

 On March 17, Taiwan's ruling Kuomintang party (KMT), attempted a unilateral move in the Legislative Yuan to force the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement to the legislative floor without giving it a clause-by-clause review as previously established in a June 2013 agreement with the opposing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Previously, in September 2013, the two parties had agreed to hold 16 public hearings over the details of the trade agreement with academics, NGOs and representatives of trade sectors impacted by the agreement. The KMT had chaired eight public hearings within a week, and several members of social groups, NGOs, and business representatives from impacted industries were either not invited or were informed at the last minute. When academics and business sector representatives gave their opinions at the hearings, the presiding chair of the legislature’s Internal Administrative Committee, KMT legislator Chang Ching-chung, said the agreement had to be adopted in its entirety and could not be amended.[25] Legislative gridlock followed, as the opposing DPP had not completed the eight hearings they had agreed to chair by March 17. Chang, citing Article 61 of the Legislative Yuan Functions Act, announced that the review process had gone beyond the 90 days allotted for review. The agreement, in the KMT's view, should therefore be considered reviewed and should be submitted to a plenary session on March 21 for a final vote.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunflower_Student_Movement
Who-Kuomintang party (KMT)
When-March 17
What-Legislative Yuan to force the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement to the legislative floor without giving it a clause-by-clause review
Why-Not given
Where-Taiwan
How-Not given
Unilateral (n.) 單方面
Legislative Yuan (n.) 立法院
Kuomintang party (n.) 國民黨
Gridlock (n.) 僵局
Allot (v.) 配發
Plenary (adj.) 全體
Session (n.) 會議